Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by CFMEU (105N)

Citation: [2026] FWC 2451

What happened

The CFMEU applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application related to employees of Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Group Pty Ltd. Initially, Newcastle Coal raised concerns about technical aspects and proposed ballot questions but later didn't object after amendments were made by the CFMEU. Glen Williams, Newcastle Branch Secretary, declared that genuine bargaining efforts had been undertaken.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission granted an amended application for a protected action ballot order. The ballot will be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), an approved ballot agent. Voting must close by 14 July 2026, establishing the ballot period. A separate order was issued (PR811560). Another Commission Member will conduct a compulsory conciliation conference to facilitate negotiations for the proposed enterprise agreement.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they address any technical concerns promptly when dealing with union applications and be prepared to engage in genuine bargaining. Failing to do so can lead to ballot orders being granted, potentially impacting industrial relations processes.

What it means for employees

Employees may have the opportunity to vote on a protected action ballot regarding an enterprise agreement. This allows them to express their views and potentially take industrial action if negotiations are unsuccessful. A conciliation conference will be held to try and reach an agreement.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protectionsprotected-action

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2451.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases