The Australian Workers' Union (002N) v DOF Australia Pty Ltd
At a glance
- 53
What happened
The Australian Workers' Union (AWU) applied to the Fair Work Commission seeking orders under s418 of the Fair Work Act 2009 to stop industrial action by DOF Australia Pty Ltd. The dispute arose from negotiations for a new enterprise agreement replacing the DOF Subsea Australia Pty Ltd ROV Casual Enterprise Agreement 2021. DOF, an offshore services company, engaged casually-based ROV employees who are members of the AWU. On June 18, 2026, these employees were demobilised from the Skandi Inventor vessel following a notice issued by Saipem instructing DOF to cease activities and return to port. This occurred during rolling stoppages initiated by the AWU and after previous notices regarding industrial action.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the AWU’s application under s418 of the Fair Work Act 2009. Deputy President Beaumont found that, based on the evidence presented, it did not appear that unprotected industrial action was occurring or threatened. The Commission must ordinarily form an opinion about this matter within 48 hours. DOF argued the demobilisation was due to instructions from Saipem and logistical constraints preventing immediate reassignment of the vessel.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they have clear communication protocols when dealing with industrial action, especially regarding contract obligations and client directives. The decision highlights the importance of documenting reasons for workforce changes and adhering to contractual notice periods where applicable. Employers need to be prepared to demonstrate that actions taken are not retaliatory responses to protected industrial action.
What it means for employees
Employees should understand their rights regarding industrial action and ensure any notices or communications from unions are properly understood. Employees engaged under casual agreements, as in this case, should review the terms of their employment contracts, particularly clauses relating to termination and project completion.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.