Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

the Applicant v Learning Online Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 2367

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant lodged an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on March 20, 2026. The application was incomplete and the required fee wasn’t paid or waived. The Commission attempted to contact the Applicant via email and SMS multiple times requesting payment and a completed form. Warnings were also issued that the application could be dismissed if these issues weren’t resolved within seven days. Despite repeated attempts to rectify the situation, the Applicant did not respond.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission Deputy President dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application. The Commission found the application was not made in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009 because it was incomplete and the fee wasn't paid or waived. the Applicant was given multiple opportunities to fix these issues but failed to respond, leading to the dismissal of her case.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware that applicants must properly complete applications and pay fees (or have them waived) for Fair Work Commission proceedings to proceed. The Commission will actively pursue incomplete applications and issue warnings before dismissing them.

What it means for employees

Employees lodging unfair dismissal claims need to ensure their application is fully completed and the required fee is paid or a waiver obtained. Ignoring communication from the Fair Work Commission regarding deficiencies in an application can lead to its dismissal.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2367.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases