Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

the Applicant v Solve Legal Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 2354

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant commenced an application under section 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009, alleging unfair dismissal by Solve Legal Pty Ltd. A conference was scheduled for February 23, 2026, but the Applicant did not attend. Multiple emails were sent to both parties requesting attendance and explanation for his absence, with no response from the Applicant. the Respondent, Solve Legal Pty Ltd, was represented.

What was decided

the Commissioner dismissed the Applicant’s application. This dismissal occurred because he failed to engage with the process and provide an explanation for his non-attendance at the scheduled conference. Section 587 of the Act allows the FWC to dismiss applications that are not made in accordance with the Act, or have no reasonable prospects of success.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure employees understand their obligations regarding Fair Work Commission processes and deadlines. Consistent communication and documentation of attempts to engage with an employee are important.

What it means for employees

Employees must actively participate in Fair Work Commission proceedings, including attending scheduled conferences and responding to correspondence promptly. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your application.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredress

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2354.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases