Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

the Applicant v National Masonry Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 2334

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant lodged a general protections application under section 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009 on April 7, 2026. The application was incomplete because the Applicant did not provide contact details for National Masonry Pty Ltd. Despite multiple attempts by Commission staff to obtain this information via email, SMS and telephone calls, including warnings about potential dismissal, he failed to respond. This occurred between April 20 and June 9, 2026.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application on its own initiative due to a lack of prosecution. The Commissioner found the Applicant had not participated in his case after initially lodging the application. He was given opportunities to provide missing information and warned about potential dismissal, but did not respond. Section 587(3)(a) of the Fair Work Act allowed for this dismissal after procedural fairness.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they have accurate contact details for employees initiating legal proceedings. This facilitates communication and can potentially resolve issues before formal action is taken, preventing costly delays or dismissals.

What it means for employees

Applicants must respond to requests from the Fair Work Commission promptly. Failure to do so, even if unintentional, can lead to an application being dismissed. Keep records of all communications with the FWC.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsunfair-dismissal

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2334.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases