Application by The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union (007V)
Citation: [2026] FWC 2329
What happened
The Applicant applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The application related to employees of Wingham Beef Exports Pty Limited. The union and employer have been bargaining over an enterprise agreement, and the union states it has genuinely tried to reach an agreement. Wingham Beef did not object to the application.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission granted the Applicant’s request for a protected action ballot order. True Vote Pty Ltd will conduct the ballot as an approved ballot agent. The voting period closes on 6 July 2026. A separate order (PR811319) was issued, and another member of the Commission will hold a compulsory conciliation conference to facilitate negotiations.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they engage in genuine bargaining with unions when negotiating enterprise agreements. Failure to do so could lead to union applications for protected action ballots, potentially disrupting operations and impacting employee relations. The decision highlights the importance of complying with requirements under the Fair Work Act regarding notification times and bargaining processes.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware that their union can seek a ballot order if negotiations with an employer stall. This allows employees to vote on whether to take protected industrial action. Employees are required to attend conciliation conferences as directed by the Commission.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2329.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections