Application by the Applicant
What happened
The Applicant sought an extension of time to file an unfair dismissal application against the Respondent. Her dismissal took effect on February 11, 2026, and the initial filing deadline was March 4, 2026. She lodged her application 81 days late, citing a job advertisement posted by the Respondent on May 21, 2026, as evidence that her redundancy wasn't genuine. The role advertised resembled her previous position. The Respondent contends the dismissal resulted from an operational restructure after losing a major contract.
What was decided
The Commissioner dismissed the Applicant’s application for an extension of time to file her unfair dismissal claim. The Commission found there were no exceptional circumstances justifying the delay. The Applicant did not act promptly upon seeing the job advertisement and didn't challenge the redundancy earlier. While the Respondent might face some difficulties due to the delay, this wasn't enough to warrant an extension. The application was dismissed.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that significant delays in lodging unfair dismissal applications are unlikely to be excused unless exceptional circumstances exist and the employee acted promptly. Even if evidence emerges later suggesting a redundancy wasn’t genuine, delaying action can prejudice a claim.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they've been unfairly dismissed must act quickly. If new information arises that challenges the reason for dismissal, it is important to file an application without undue delay. Significant delays are likely to result in an application being rejected.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.