the Applicant v Commonwealth Bank Australia
Citation: [2026] FWC 2284
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant applied to the Fair Work Commission seeking assistance with a dispute concerning his performance assessment at Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA). The dispute relates to clause 7 of the Commonwealth Bank Enterprise Agreement 2023, which outlines how performance ratings are determined. the Applicant believed the process was unfair and transparent. A conciliation conference failed to resolve the issue, prompting the Applicant to request a hearing.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found it did not have the power to make a binding recommendation regarding the Applicant’s dispute. The Commission can conciliate but cannot arbitrate or make binding recommendations. This decision was based on clauses 38 and 7 of the Enterprise Agreement, and relevant legislation. The Commissioner dismissed the Applicant's application.
What it means for employers
Employers should carefully review their enterprise agreements to understand the scope of dispute resolution processes and the limitations on the Fair Work Commission’s powers. Ensure performance assessment processes are fair, transparent, and clearly communicated to employees.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware that while enterprise agreements provide a dispute resolution process, the outcomes may be limited by the agreement's terms. If a dispute remains unresolved, other avenues for redress may need to be explored.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2284.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →