Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Application by Redpath Contract Services Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 2083

At a glance

Employees affected
2

What happened

Redpath Contract Services Pty Ltd applied to vary a redundancy pay assessment. The company sought to reduce redundancy pay for two employees. The employees had since secured new employment. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the new employment was acceptable when determining the redundancy pay. the Deputy President heard the application.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed Redpath Contract Services Pty Ltd’s application to vary the redundancy pay. The Commission found the company’s application was not successful. The decision references previous cases, Australian Commercial Catering Pty Ltd v Powell, Marcelia & Togia, Maria and Application by Spotless Services Australia Limited T/A Alliance Catering, for guidance.

What it means for employers

Employers should carefully consider the impact of subsequent employment when calculating redundancy pay. The Fair Work Commission will assess whether new employment is acceptable when determining redundancy entitlements.

What it means for employees

Employees who receive redundancy pay and subsequently find new employment should be aware that this may affect the amount of redundancy pay they are entitled to. Employers must properly assess subsequent employment when calculating redundancy payments.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

redundancygeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2083.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases