the Applicant v Bytewize Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 1860
At a glance
- Penalty
- $4,406
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant was dismissed from her role at Bytewize Pty Ltd on October 8, 2025. She subsequently applied to the Fair Work Commission for an unfair dismissal remedy. The company suggested the dismissal was due to misconduct, but this claim was rejected. the Applicant found new employment approximately three weeks after her termination.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission determined the Applicant’s dismissal was unfair and ordered Bytewize Pty Ltd to pay compensation of $4,406.05 gross, less any applicable tax. The Commission applied the ‘Sprigg formula’ for calculating compensation, considering factors like lost remuneration, contingencies, and mitigation efforts. Reinstatement was deemed inappropriate.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure dismissal reasons are valid and defensible. Claims of misconduct must be substantiated with evidence. Failing to do so can result in costly compensation orders even when reinstatement isn't sought. The Commission considers the length of service when assessing compensation amounts.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should seek advice and consider applying to the Fair Work Commission. Even if mitigation efforts are not perfect, it doesn’t necessarily preclude a positive outcome in an unfair dismissal claim.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc1860.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →