Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2025

Imogen Munro v ACN 063 541 873 Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 1729

What happened

Imogen Munro brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against ACN 063 541 873 Pty Ltd. The Deputy President considered objections raised by the respondent concerning a high income threshold and a genuine redundancy. The case number was U2025/16649.

What was decided

The Deputy President dismissed the objection regarding the high income threshold. However, the objection concerning genuine redundancy was upheld. Consequently, the substantive application was not determined. The decision references previous cases Florenca, Elvina v Industrial Foundation For Accident Prevention T/A IFAP and Shashi Mathew v Australian Guild Of Education Pty Ltd.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware that objections based on a genuine redundancy can succeed, preventing a claim from proceeding. This highlights the importance of carefully assessing redundancy situations and ensuring they are genuinely occurring.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware that an employer can raise objections to an unfair dismissal claim, such as those based on income or genuine redundancy. If such an objection is upheld, the claim may not proceed to a substantive hearing.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredundancy

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/imogen-munro-v-acn-063-541-873-pty-ltd-2026-fwc-1729

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases