the Applicant v Network RV Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 159
What happened
the Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against Network RV Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the Applicant’s annual earnings were above the high-income threshold, which would have prevented him from pursuing the claim. The application number is U2025/12727.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the jurisdictional objection that the Applicant’s annual earnings exceeded the high-income threshold. The Commission found his annual earnings were below the threshold. The decision states, 'Applicant’s annual earnings found to be below the high-income threshold – jurisdictional objection dismissed.'
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they accurately assess employee income to determine eligibility for Fair Work protections. Misclassifying an employee as high-income to avoid obligations can be costly.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware of the income thresholds that may affect their ability to pursue claims in the Fair Work Commission. Accurate record-keeping of income is important.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc159.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections