[2025] FWC 981
Citation: [2025] FWC 981
What happened
The Applicant claims she was unfairly dismissed from Jelmac Australia Pty Ltd on November 27, 2024. She filed an application with the Fair Work Commission in December 2024. The Applicant missed several scheduled hearings and failed to submit required documents, including a reply to the Respondent's submissions, despite repeated directions and warnings from the Commission. She initially claimed a car accident prevented her from attending a hearing, providing photos of a damaged vehicle. However, the Respondent raised concerns about the authenticity of these photos, citing data indicating they were taken over a month prior. The Applicant then claimed she was a passenger and the photos were sent to her after the accident, but failed to provide further evidence. She also made allegations of fraud against the Respondent. Ultimately, she refused to provide further details and submitted a statutory declaration.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application under section 399A(1)(a) and (b) of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission found she failed to comply with directions and provide sufficient evidence to support her claims. The Applicant’s repeated failure to attend hearings and provide requested documentation led to the dismissal. The Respondent had raised concerns about the reliability of the Applicant’s evidence and the inconsistencies in her version of events. The Commission noted the Respondent’s incurred costs in defending the application.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc981.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →