Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 29 April 2025

[2025] FWC 922

Citation: [2025] FWC 922

What happened

Muaz Khan, an Assistant Mentor, was employed part-time by Step Up Disability Services Pty Ltd from around August 2022, working eight hours a week under a Supported Wage System. His legal guardian, Zaffar Khan, filed an unfair dismissal application on his behalf after Muaz’s employment ended on September 1, 2024. The dismissal stemmed from a dispute over the signing of a new Services Agreement related to NDIS fee increases. Emails exchanged between Mr. Khan and Step Up revealed concerns about Muaz’s wages and a request for a reference letter. Step Up repeatedly requested the agreement's signature, ultimately terminating Muaz’s services when it wasn't provided. Mr. Khan attempted to contact Step Up to discuss his concerns but was unsuccessful. Muaz attended work on September 2, 2024, and was sent home.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found Muaz was protected from unfair dismissal and that his dismissal was not a case of genuine redundancy. While Step Up had a valid reason for the dismissal related to the unsigned Services Agreement, the Commission considered the circumstances surrounding the termination. The Commission determined the dismissal was harsh, unjust, and unreasonable. The Commission ordered that Step Up reinstate Muaz to his position and pay him compensation. The Commission noted the communication difficulties and the lack of dedicated HR expertise at Step Up contributed to the situation.

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc922.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases