the Applicant v P. & C. EXCAVATIONS PTY. LTD.
Citation: [2025] FWC 3839
What happened
the Applicant brought an unfair dismissal claim against P. & C. Excavations Pty Ltd. The company is an excavation business. the Applicant was allegedly dismissed from his employment. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the Applicant was dismissed within the meaning of the Fair Work Act and whether he met the minimum employment period to bring a claim.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application. The Commission found that he was not dismissed within the meaning of section 386 of the Fair Work Act. It also found he did not meet the minimum employment period requirement. the Commissioner noted that the Applicant’s claim raised multiple jurisdictional objections. As stated in the decision, “the Applicant’s allegations do not amount to a dismissal within the meaning of s 386 of the Act.”
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they understand the definition of 'dismissal' under the Fair Work Act. A cessation of employment does not automatically constitute a dismissal. They should also be aware of the minimum employment period requirements for unfair dismissal claims.
What it means for employees
Employees need to understand that not all terminations of employment are considered 'dismissals' under the Fair Work Act. There are also minimum employment period requirements to be eligible for an unfair dismissal claim.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3839.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →