the Applicant v BHP Coal Pty Ltd
Citation: [2025] FWC 3422
What happened
the Applicant commenced an application for an unfair dismissal remedy. BHP Coal Pty Ltd, his former employer, sought to have the application dismissed because it was lodged outside the prescribed time limit. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the time limit should be extended.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application. The Commissioner found there were no exceptional circumstances to justify extending the time limit for filing the application. As stated in the decision, “I am not persuaded that there were any exceptional circumstances that would warrant an extension of time”.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees are aware of the strict time limits for lodging applications to the Fair Work Commission. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to these deadlines, as failure to do so can result in an application being dismissed.
What it means for employees
Employees need to be aware of the time limits for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission. If an employee believes they have a valid reason for missing the deadline, they should seek legal advice promptly to assess whether exceptional circumstances exist that might allow for an extension.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3422.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →