Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2025

the Applicant v the Respondent & the Second Respondent, Trading As Apac Digital Dentistry & Laboratory

Citation: [2025] FWC 3378

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant commenced employment with Apac Digital Dentistry & Laboratory in 2023. He was dismissed from his position. the Applicant then brought an application to the Fair Work Commission seeking a remedy for unfair dismissal. The Commission notes that this application is linked to a previous application under s 394 of the Fair Work Act.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission has granted the Applicant’s application for a remedy for unfair dismissal. the Deputy President found that there were no reasonable prospects of success for the Respondent in opposing the application. The decision references previous cases including *Lockyear, Iain Kenneth v Graeme Cox* and *Resta, Rosa v Myer Pty Ltd*.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they comply with all directions from the Fair Work Commission. Failure to do so can lead to an unfair dismissal claim being successful.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should seek legal advice and consider applying to the Fair Work Commission.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3378.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases