the Applicant v the Respondent & the Second Respondent, Trading As Apac Digital Dentistry & Laboratory
At a glance
- 1
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Apac Digital Dentistry & Laboratory in 2023. He was dismissed from his position. the Applicant then brought an application to the Fair Work Commission seeking a remedy for unfair dismissal. The Commission notes that this application is linked to a previous application under s 394 of the Fair Work Act.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission has granted the Applicant’s application for a remedy for unfair dismissal. the Deputy President found that there were no reasonable prospects of success for the Respondent in opposing the application. The decision references previous cases including *Lockyear, Iain Kenneth v Graeme Cox* and *Resta, Rosa v Myer Pty Ltd*.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they comply with all directions from the Fair Work Commission. Failure to do so can lead to an unfair dismissal claim being successful.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should seek legal advice and consider applying to the Fair Work Commission.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.