[2025] FWC 2787
Citation: [2025] FWC 2787
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
Mr Musharaf Waheed applied to the Fair Work Commission for an unfair deactivation remedy after being deactivated by Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd. He initially filed an unfair dismissal application on 20 June 2025, then a deactivation application on 8 July 2025, and again on 21 July 2025. Rasier Pacific Pty Ltd stated the deactivation occurred on 16 June 2025. Mr Waheed provided evidence of a final deactivation notice email dated 17 June 2025. The Commission initially misclassified the application.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found Mr Waheed’s application was made within the 21-day statutory period. The Commission determined the deactivation took effect on 17 June 2025, based on the email Mr Waheed received. Therefore, an extension of time to file the application was not required. If the deactivation had occurred on 16 June 2025, exceptional circumstances might have warranted an extension. The case will now proceed to a case management conference.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they accurately identify the type of application being made by employees and respond promptly. Misclassifying an application, or incorrect dates, can impact timelines and potentially lead to extensions of time being granted.
What it means for employees
Employees seeking remedies like unfair deactivation should be mindful of the strict time limits for filing applications. Providing clear evidence of the date the deactivation took effect is important.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2787.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →