[2025] FWC 2632
Citation: [2025] FWC 2632
What happened
the Applicant, a 62-year-old stevedore, was dismissed from Qube Ports Pty Ltd on January 15, 2025. The dismissal was based on allegations of misconduct, including showing photos of colleagues and other workplace behavior inconsistent with company policies. the Applicant was issued a final warning in March 2024 related to the photo incident. Qube initiated an investigation following a complaint from a co-worker, Ms. Cogger, regarding the Applicant's behavior. the Applicant alleges victimization and claims Qube created an unsafe work environment. He was paid four weeks’ pay in lieu of notice.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found that Qube had a valid reason for dismissing the Applicant, stemming from an incident involving photos of colleagues in March 2024. However, the Commission determined his dismissal was harsh, unjust, and unreasonable, considering the final warning he had received and a lack of evidence supporting claims he was a 'bully'. The Commission ordered Qube to reinstate the Applicant and compensate him. The Commissioner noted that Qube's handling of a co-worker’s concerns was inadequate.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2632.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections