the Applicant v Private Fleet Pty Ltd
Citation: [2025] FWC 2185
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Private Fleet Pty Ltd. He then brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy to the Fair Work Commission. The Commission considered whether the Applicant had completed the minimum employment period and whether Private Fleet was a small business employer for jurisdictional purposes.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission upheld a jurisdictional objection. The Commission found that the Applicant had not completed the minimum employment period required to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The Commission also determined that Private Fleet was not a small business employer. Consequently, the application for an unfair dismissal remedy was dismissed.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they accurately assess an employee's length of service when dealing with potential unfair dismissal claims. They should also verify their classification as a small business employer, as this impacts jurisdictional requirements.
What it means for employees
Employees need to be aware of the minimum employment period required to bring an unfair dismissal claim. Failing to meet this requirement can prevent a claim from proceeding.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2185.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections