[2025] FWC 1959
Citation: [2025] FWC 1959
What happened
the Applicant was dismissed from Jelmac Australia Pty Ltd Trading As Jelmac Directional Drilling. She applied for an unfair dismissal remedy, but failed to comply with directions from the Fair Work Commission and missed hearings. Jelmac Australia Pty Ltd then applied for a costs order against the Applicant, claiming her unreasonable actions caused them to incur costs. Jelmac sought $43,972.26 in costs, based on indemnity costs. the Applicant claimed she had cause for her actions and that wages and entitlements were still owing.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found that the Applicant’s failure to comply with directions and attend hearings was unreasonable. While the Commission didn't find her application vexatious or without reasonable prospects of success under sections 611(2)(a) and (b) of the Fair Work Act, it did find that her actions under section 400A caused Jelmac to incur additional costs. A costs order was made, requiring the Applicant to pay $16,822.40 to Jelmac. Certain costs items were excluded from the order.
What it means for employers
Employers can seek cost orders against employees who unreasonably fail to comply with Commission directions or attend hearings during Fair Work proceedings. Thoroughly documenting reasons for dismissal and maintaining records of employee communications is crucial.
What it means for employees
Employees must comply with directions and attend hearings in Fair Work proceedings. Failure to do so can result in a cost order, requiring them to pay the other party’s legal costs. Providing credible explanations for absences is essential.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1959.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections