Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 29 April 2025

[2025] FWC 1126

Citation: [2025] FWC 1126

At a glance

Penalty
$8,400
Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant was a casual receptionist at J.F.B. Investments Pty Ltd (Spoilers Relaxation Centre) from around mid-2009 until her dismissal on September 12, 2024. She worked regular hours and earned approximately $18,200 annually. the Respondent owned the business and became more involved in its operations around mid-2023. the Applicant alleges she was unfairly dismissed and sought compensation. J.F.B. Investments Pty Ltd and the Respondent failed to engage with the Fair Work Commission proceedings, including failing to attend hearings or file required documents.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant was protected from unfair dismissal and that her dismissal was harsh, unjust, unreasonable, and not consistent with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code. Due to J.F.B. Investments Pty Ltd's failure to engage in the proceedings, the case was determined in their absence. The Commission ordered compensation of $8,400 AUD plus superannuation, taxed as required by law.

What it means for employers

Employers, particularly small businesses, must adhere to procedural fairness requirements and comply with directions from the Fair Work Commission. Failure to engage in proceedings can result in decisions being made against them based solely on the employee's evidence, potentially leading to financial penalties.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should pursue their claims through the Fair Work Commission. Even if an employer fails to participate in proceedings, a remedy may still be available.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionssmall-businesspenalty-ratesmodern-award-variationcasual-conversion

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1126.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases