[2024] FWCA 616
Citation: [2024] FWCA 616
What happened
Qube Logistics (Rail) Pty Ltd (Qube) sought to vary two enterprise agreements: the QUBE Logistics (Rail) Train Crew and RTBU NSW Enterprise Agreement 2015, and the QUBE Logistics (Rail) Train Crew NSW Enterprise Agreement 2019. The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (RTBU) is covered by these agreements. Qube aimed to remove ambiguity related to how award terms were incorporated into the agreements, specifically concerning allowances and penalties. This application followed a claim filed by the RTBU in the Federal Court alleging historical and ongoing underpayment of those same allowances and penalties.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission considered Qube's application to vary the enterprise agreements. The proposed variations would have retrospectively removed accrued entitlements to certain allowances and penalties claimed by the RTBU in an underpayment claim. The Deputy President did not consider there existed a clear case for a definite conclusion regarding either limb of the application, so the application was dismissed.
What it means for employers
Employers should carefully review how award terms are incorporated into enterprise agreements to ensure clarity and avoid potential disputes over entitlements. Retrospective changes to agreements to address underpayment claims can be risky and may not succeed if there is ambiguity or uncertainty.
What it means for employees
Employees should understand the terms of their enterprise agreement, including how awards are incorporated. If they believe they have been underpaid, they should pursue appropriate avenues for redress, such as lodging a claim with the Fair Work Commission or Federal Court.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2024fwca616.pdfSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections