Skip to main content
FCAFederal Court of Australia · 4 August 2024

Fair Work Ombudsman v Sushi Bay Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3)

Citation: [2024] FCA 869

At a glance

Penalty
$15,300,000

What happened

The Sushi Bay group of companies operated sushi restaurants in NSW, the ACT, and the Northern Territory under the director. From February 2016 to January 2020, the companies systematically exploited immigrant workers through false record-keeping, unreasonable wage deduction requirements, and failure to pay minimum award rates, casual loadings, annual leave loadings, overtime rates, penalty rates for weekend and public holiday work, and annual leave entitlements on termination. The Fair Work Ombudsman discovered the contraventions and the companies subsequently entered liquidation.

What was decided

The Court found multiple serious civil remedy contraventions including knowingly creating false records, producing false records to inspectors, unreasonably requiring wage refunds, and systematic underpayment of award entitlements. The director and four corporate entities were ordered to pay substantial pecuniary penalties totalling $15.3 million. The director's penalty of $1.6 million was to be distributed to affected employees as compensation for underpayment. The corporate entities' penalties were to be paid to the Commonwealth, reflecting the gravity and systematic nature of the wage theft.

What it means for employers

Employers must maintain accurate wage records and ensure all employee payments comply with modern award rates, including casual loadings, penalty rates, and leave entitlements. Attempting to recover wages from employees through deductions is unlawful. False record-keeping and misrepresentation to inspectors carry severe financial penalties. Systematic contraventions, especially those knowingly committed, trigger maximum penalty levels.

What it means for employees

Employees at the Sushi Bay restaurants were underpaid across multiple categories: award rates, casual loadings, overtime, and public holiday work. The case demonstrates that courts will intervene to recover lost wages even after business failure. Employees should report wage irregularities to the Fair Work Ombudsman rather than accepting incorrect payments.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentwage-theftgeneral-protectionsmisclassification

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2024/2024fca0869

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases