Kelly v Commonwealth of Australia as represented by Services Australia (formerly the Department of Human Services)
At a glance
- 1
What happened
Brendan Kelly, a former Commonwealth employee, claimed discrimination based on sexual orientation and disability (ADHD and mental health conditions) by co-workers and supervisors at Centrelink service centres. He alleged contraventions of sex discrimination, disability discrimination, and Fair Work Act provisions. He sought declarations, damages exceeding $4 million, and civil penalties, relying partly on conduct by a university student on placement.
What was decided
The court dismissed an interlocutory application to strike out parts of the claim. The court found that some claims, particularly those involving the student's alleged conduct and damages claims, should be struck out or stayed pending AHRC complaint processes. However, the court allowed the proceedings to continue in relation to remaining claims involving identified employee respondents.
What it means for employers
Employers are responsible for discrimination by their own employees acting in their capacity as employees. Discrimination complaints are subject to statutory procedural requirements and may be constrained by AHRC jurisdictional rules. Employers should have clear discrimination complaint mechanisms.
What it means for employees
Employees who experience discrimination should use internal complaint processes and may lodge AHRC complaints. Court remedies may be limited by prior AHRC involvement and the statutory framework. Discrimination claims require identified causation between protected attributes and adverse action.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.