Civil Air Operations Officers' Association of Australia v the Respondent (No 2)
Citation: [2022] FCA 1077
What happened
Airservices Australia changed its “ATC Career Model” policy in March 2015 without consulting employees or their union, the Civil Air Operations Officers' Association of Australia. This breached an enterprise agreement and section 50 of the Fair Work Act. A previous court decision confirmed this breach. The current case concerns what remedies should be imposed for this breach.
What was decided
The Federal Court ordered Airservices Australia to pay a total penalty of $12,750 to the union. The court decided against granting declaratory relief. This follows a prior finding that Airservices breached its enterprise agreement by failing to consult with employees about policy changes.
What it means for employers
Employers must fulfil consultation obligations outlined in enterprise agreements and relevant legislation. Failing to do so can result in significant penalties, even if corrective measures are subsequently implemented. Regular engagement and transparency with employees and their representatives is crucial.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware of their rights under enterprise agreements and the Fair Work Act. Unions play a role in ensuring employers meet these obligations. Employees impacted by policy changes should document any negative effects they experience.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2022/2022fca1077Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections