Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining & Energy Union v Boggabri Coal Operations Pty Ltd
Citation: [2021] FCA 719
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant, an employee at Boggabri Coal Operations, was authorized to take protected industrial action on specified dates (30 September, 2 October, and 3 October 2019) for two-hour periods commencing at notified times. Before each notified commencement time, the Applicant parked his dozer, logged out systems, turned off the equipment, and walked to be transported to administration. These preparatory steps (taking 5-9 minutes before each protected action) secured and made safe the dozer as required by normal work procedures. the Respondent deducted four hours' pay for each date, claiming the Applicant engaged in unprotected industrial action before the protected action commenced.
What was decided
Justice Jagot dismissed the union's application. The court found that the Applicant did engage in unprotected industrial action by stopping work early to prepare and secure equipment. The court held that because the protected industrial action had a specific notified commencement time, any work stoppage before that time constituted unprotected industrial action. the Respondent was entitled under section 474 to deduct four hours' pay. The court rejected arguments that equipment securing was a normal part of work that could be performed before protected action commenced.
What it means for employers
When protected industrial action is authorized for specific times, any work stoppage or change in work performance before the notified time constitutes unprotected industrial action. Employers can apply pay deductions under section 474 if employees stop work before the authorized action period to prepare or secure equipment.
What it means for employees
Employees should understand that if they engage in any work stoppage or altered work performance before the notified time of protected industrial action (even to secure equipment), this may constitute unprotected industrial action and expose them to pay deductions.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2021/2021fca0719Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections