Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FCAFederal Court of Australia · 16 May 2021

Enkel v We R Finance Pty Ltd (No 2)

Citation: [2021] FCA 529

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

Alastair Enkel brought a cross-appeal against We R Finance Pty Ltd (WRF) and director Harry Charles Ross after the Western Australian Industrial Magistrates Court initially dismissed his claim against Ross. The matter concerned underpayment of award rates. WRF had also brought an initial appeal which it discontinued before hearing. On cross-appeal, Enkel sought to overturn the dismissal against Ross and to increase penalties.

What was decided

Justice Jackson allowed the cross-appeal in a prior judgment, finding Ross liable for involvement in contraventions and increasing penalties. In this costs decision, Jackson dismissed Enkel's application for costs of the appeal and cross-appeal. Although Enkel ultimately succeeded substantially, the Court found the refusal of a Calderbank settlement offer by the respondents, while ultimately unwise, did not constitute unreasonable conduct under s 570(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act.

What it means for employers

Parties should carefully consider settlement offers. However, refusing a settlement offer does not necessarily result in a costs order unless the conduct is unreasonable by a high threshold.

What it means for employees

While employees may succeed in appeals concerning underpayment, costs awards are limited under the Fair Work Act. Success does not guarantee recovery of legal costs unless the respondent acted unreasonably.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpayment

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2021/2021fca0529

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases