Barkly Region Alcohol and Drug Abuse Advisory Group Aboriginal Corporation v Naylor
At a glance
- 1
What happened
Stewart and Anna Naylor were CEO and Services Manager of Barkly Region Alcohol and Drug Abuse Advisory Group Aboriginal Corporation for over seven years. Stewart Naylor claimed and was paid approximately $474,287 in overtime payments for hours either not performed or unauthorized. Anna Naylor was paid approximately $153,887 in overtime. Stewart Naylor also authorized expenditure on personal items (iPads, iPhones, luxury clothing) totaling tens of thousands. These actions paralleled criminal fraud proceedings alleging deception and theft by deception.
What was decided
The court granted a stay of the civil proceedings because criminal proceedings against both Naylors were already on foot for substantially the same conduct (obtaining benefits by deception). Under s.553 of the Fair Work Act, pecuniary penalty proceedings are stayed when criminal proceedings are based on substantially the same conduct. The Court stayed the entire civil proceeding in the interests of justice, noting the Naylors' lack of financial means and Mrs. Naylor's serious illness.
What it means for employers
Organizations must implement proper authorization and governance controls over overtime claims and expenditure, particularly for senior executives. Where fraud is suspected, criminal and civil remedies may be available, but civil penalty proceedings will be stayed pending criminal trial. Employers should preserve evidence and reporting of suspected misconduct.
What it means for employees
Where employee misconduct involves potential fraud or theft, criminal proceedings may precede or overlap with civil remedies. Employees have rights to silence in criminal proceedings, which may delay civil compensation. Claimed overtime and personal expenses not authorized by organizational policy may be treated as fraudulent misappropriation.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.