the Applicant v Conair Australia Pty Ltd (No 2)
Citation: [2018] FCA 992
What happened
The Applicant sought judicial review of a Fair Work Commission decision refusing her permission to appeal and dismissing her appeal. The Respondent applied for an order that the Applicant pay its costs on an indemnity basis, arguing the proceedings were instituted without reasonable cause. The court previously granted a summary dismissal of the Applicant’s claim. She did not file submissions or evidence in response to the costs application.
What was decided
The Federal Court found the Applicant's judicial review claim was instituted without reasonable cause because it lacked merit and failed to allege jurisdictional error. The Respondent is ordered to be paid $71,000 in costs on an indemnity basis. The court also agreed with the Respondent’s criticisms of the Applicant’s legal representatives.
What it means for employers
Employers can seek cost orders against litigants who bring claims without reasonable prospects of success. Legal representatives may face personal costs orders if they act unreasonably in pursuing unmeritorious cases. Failing to address arguments or identify a legal basis for a claim can be considered unreasonable conduct.
What it means for employees
If you pursue legal action with little chance of
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2018/2018fca0992Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections