Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v the Respondent
Citation: [2018] FCA 1379
What happened
A Fair Work inspector issued a notice to the Maritime Union of Australia under s 712 of the Fair Work Act requiring production of various documents concerning work stoppages at the Port of Melbourne on 8 December 2017. The documents sought included correspondence, meeting records, emails, and communications between the union and various parties about the stoppages.
What was decided
Justice Bromberg declared the notice void and of no effect. The Court found the notice failed to provide the recipient with sufficient clarity about which specific provisions of the Fair Work Act the inspector was investigating. The notice did not disclose that it was concerned with Part 3-3 (industrial action provisions) until the description field at the end, violating the requirement for clear specification of purpose.
What it means for employers
Fair Work inspectors must issue clear notices specifying the statutory provisions being investigated. Overly broad or unclear notices may be invalidated.
What it means for employees
Unions and organisations receiving production notices from Fair Work inspectors can challenge those notices if they do not clearly specify the statutory purpose and relevant Fair Work Act provisions.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2018/2018fca1379Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections