Skip to main content
FCAFederal Court of Australia · 11 August 2015

Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Adams

Citation: [2015] FCA 828

At a glance

Employees affected
74

What happened

Seventy-four building workers employed by Crown Construction Services engaged in industrial action on 28 February 2013 at the New Children's Hospital construction site in Nedlands, Western Australia. The workers failed to attend or remain at work as required. A Fair Work Commission order dated 19 February 2013 had prohibited the Crown employees from engaging in or threatening industrial action at the site. The workers knew of this prohibition.

What was decided

The Court found each of the 74 respondents contravened section 417(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) by engaging in industrial action in breach of the Fair Work Commission order. The proceeding alleging contravention of section 421(1) was dismissed due to failure to satisfy service requirements of the Fair Work Commission stop order. No penalties were determined in this judgment.

What it means for employers

Employers in the construction industry should ensure that Fair Work Commission orders prohibiting industrial action are properly served on workers. Workers who engage in industrial action in breach of such orders may face legal penalties. Employers must comply with procedural requirements for enforcement.

What it means for employees

Workers who engage in industrial action in breach of a Fair Work Commission order prohibiting such action may be found to have contravened the Fair Work Act and face pecuniary penalties. Compliance with court orders is mandatory.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2015/2015fca0828

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases