Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FCAFederal Court of Australia · 2 July 2015

Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Upton

Citation: [2015] FCA 672

At a glance

Penalty
$24,000

What happened

Bradley Upton, an official of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, attended the Wheatstone liquefied natural gas project near Onslow, Western Australia on two occasions. On 8 October 2012, after being directed to use a sea container meeting room, he responded with obscene verbal abuse about how the CFMEU did business differently. On 13 February 2013, he held a meeting with employees in a residential area of the project despite being offered an alternative location.

What was decided

The court declared two contraventions of section 500 of the Fair Work Act (improper manner while exercising rights). Penalties imposed were: Upton $4,000 total ($3,000 for first, $1,000 for second), and CFMEU $20,000 total ($15,000 for first, $5,000 for second). The court found the conduct deliberate but considered Upton's view about the meeting room was not wholly unreasonable.

What it means for employers

Site occupiers can enforce reasonable requirements about meeting locations and health and safety compliance. Union officials who use abusive language or breach site requirements face penalties.

What it means for employees

Union representatives exercising right of entry must comply with reasonable occupier requests and cannot use abusive conduct.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2015/2015fca0672

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases