Poppy v Service to Youth Council Incorporated
At a glance
- $2,500
- 1
What happened
Sarah Poppy was employed as Marketing Manager by Service to Youth Council from 2006. She had a strong track record and direct reporting relationship with the CEO. In August 2009, Poppy informed management she was pregnant and requested flexible work (3 days in office, 2 days at home). Between August 2009 and her maternity leave commencement, Poppy was moved to a common office space, excluded from senior management meetings, mentoring ceased, her position was restructured, and management changed. She gave birth on 22 March 2010 and was made redundant while on maternity leave in July 2010.
What was decided
Justice White found only one contravention: the employer failed to respond in writing to Poppy's flexible work request within 21 days as required by law. The court ordered a $2,500 penalty (paid to the employee). All other claims were dismissed. While the judge found Poppy had suffered changes to her role and conditions after announcing pregnancy, this did not constitute unlawful discrimination under sex discrimination or fair work laws in the context of a genuine redundancy.
What it means for employers
Employers must respond in writing to flexible work requests within 21 days, even if refusing the request. While restructuring and role changes are legitimate, employers should document genuine business reasons carefully. Changes to pregnant employees' roles should be approached cautiously and decisions should be clearly documented.
What it means for employees
Employees requesting flexible work are entitled to a written response within 21 days under the Fair Work Act. While pregnancy-related role changes may feel unfair, proving unlawful discrimination requires demonstrating the real reason for dismissal was pregnancy or family responsibilities, not a genuine redundancy.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.