Skip to main content
FCAFederal Court of Australia · 7 October 2013

the Applicant v Sort Worx Pty Ltd

Citation: [2013] FCA 1012

At a glance

Penalty
$10,000
Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant was dismissed by Gippsland Waste on 24 July 2012 without valid reason. The Fair Work Commission found the dismissal unfair and ordered reinstatement with restoration of lost pay and superannuation. However, after the Commission's orders, Gippsland Waste lost its major council contracts and no longer had positions available. By the time of trial, the Applicant was no longer seeking reinstatement.

What was decided

The Court ordered Gippsland Waste to comply with the Commission's orders. the Respondent paid $15,045.39 in lost wages plus $385.71 superannuation. The Court imposed a civil penalty of $10,000 on the Respondent for contravening the Commission's orders, with a three-month stay on the penalty.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Fair Work Commission orders for reinstatement and restoration of wages. Failure to comply without valid justification results in civil penalties. Change of business circumstances does not excuse non-compliance with orders to reinstate.

What it means for employees

When an employee wins an unfair dismissal claim and is ordered reinstated, the employer must comply with the order. If reinstatement becomes impossible due to business changes, the employer still owes the employee lost wages and superannuation, plus may face penalties.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissal

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2013/2013fca1012

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases