John Holland Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 4)
Citation: [2011] FCA 618
What happened
the Applicant commenced proceedings against the CFMEU and other unions alleging unlawful industrial action at the Worsley Alumina Refinery in Western Australia. The Applicant claimed unions breached the Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act by organizing or engaging in unlawful industrial action. The matter proceeded to hearing where the Applicant closed its case but had not yet resolved all agreed facts. the Respondent made a 'no case to answer' submission, arguing the evidence was insufficient to support the allegations even if accepted at face value.
What was decided
the Commissioner ruled on the Respondent's no case submission. The Commissioner held that in the circumstances of this case, it was appropriate to allow the Respondent to make the submission despite other respondents not doing so. The Commissioner noted that the question turned largely on legal interpretation of statutory provisions rather than adequacy of evidence. The matter was then adjourned for further hearing.
What it means for employers
This case involves complex procedural and industrial action issues rather than establishing substantive employment law principles applicable to most employers.
What it means for employees
This case concerns procedural and union-level disputes rather than establishing principles directly affecting individual employees.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2011/2011fca0618Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →