Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2022-03-10-mccullagh-and-mccullagh-litigation-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- McCullagh Enterprises
- Penalty
- $6,660
- Employees affected
- 1
- Awards cited
- MA000113
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced legal action against the Respondent and the Second Respondent, who operated McCullagh Enterprises, a campervan hire business in Hobart. The investigation began after a former visa holder employee from the Philippines contacted the Fair Work Ombudsman seeking assistance. The employee worked as a casual campervan cleaner between September 2018 and March 2020. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in July 2021, alleging underpayment of the casual minimum wage and overtime, weekend, and public holiday rates under the General Retail Industry Award 2010.
What was decided
The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking penalties against the Respondent and the Second Respondent for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. Each respondent faces a potential penalty of up to $6,660. The regulator also seeks an order for the partnership to rectify the alleged underpayment, including superannuation. A directions hearing is scheduled for April 2022 in the Federal Circuit and Family Court.
What it means for employers
Employers must comply with workplace laws and act on Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and orders to back-pay underpaid entitlements.
What it means for employees
Employees, particularly visa holders, can seek assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman if they have concerns about their pay or entitlements without fear of visa repercussions. The Assurance Protocol protects visa holders who seek help.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/march-2022/20220310-mccullagh-and-mccullagh-litigation-media-releaseSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections