Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

Modern award superannuation clause review 2026

Citation: [2026] FWCFB 169

At a glance

Awards cited
MA000123, MA000017

What happened

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) initiated a review of superannuation clauses in modern awards, following changes to superannuation laws via the Treasury Laws (Payday Superannuation) Act 2025. The Act requires employers to make superannuation contributions at the same time as salary payments. This review also addresses a merger between Telstra Super and Aware Super, impacting the Telstra Award 2015. Commission staff reviewed awards and found one, the Textile, Clothing, Footwear and Associated Industries Award 2020, had a clause potentially inconsistent with the new law.

What was decided

The FWC provisionally decided to delete clause 27.2(b) of the Textile Award, which stipulated contributions within 28 days. They also propose replacing ‘Telstra Super’ with ‘Aware Super’ in clauses 18.3(a) and (b) of the Telstra Award due to the merger. Interested parties are invited to submit comments by July 24, 2026. If no objections are received, final determinations will be issued.

What it means for employers

Employers should review their modern award obligations regarding superannuation contributions. The Payday Superannuation Act requires timely payments alongside wages. Employers covered by the Textile Award may need to adjust payment schedules. Staying informed about changes to superannuation legislation and how they impact awards is crucial for compliance.

What it means for employees

Employees will benefit from more timely superannuation contributions, aligning with their salary payments. Those working under the Telstra or Textile Awards should be aware of the proposed changes to award clauses related to superannuation funds and payment schedules. Employees can provide feedback on these provisional views.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesmodern-award-variationgeneral-protectionswage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwcfb169.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases