Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

Application by Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (128V)

Citation: [2026] FWCA 1726

What happened

The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) applied for approval of the OKS Erections Pty Ltd and CEPU – Plumbing Division (Vic) Plumbing Enterprise Agreement 2024 – 2027. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement covering employees of OKS Erections Pty Ltd. A minor procedural error occurred with the notice given to employees regarding their representational rights.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission approved the enterprise agreement on July 7, 2026. While there was a technical error in the employee representation notice, the Commission found it did not disadvantage employees and didn't prevent genuine agreement. The CEPU is covered by the agreement as required by law.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure all notices to employees regarding representational rights are in the prescribed form. While minor errors can be overlooked, consistent adherence to legal requirements is crucial for enterprise agreement approval.

What it means for employees

Employees should review any agreements presented to them and understand their representational rights. Minor procedural errors don't necessarily invalidate an agreement but it’s important to ensure your rights are protected during the bargaining process.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwca1726.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases