Application by Timber, Furnishing and Textiles Union (302V)
Citation: [2026] FWC 3027
What happened
The Timber, Furnishing and Textiles Union (TFTU) sought authorisation under section 248 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for three employers to bargain collectively for a multi-enterprise agreement. The employers are Sherwood Interiors Pty Ltd, Jacaranda Industries, and Trendgosa Pty Ltd. They manufacture commercial furniture products. All three are national system employers. The application was made with the consent of the employers and union members.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission granted the single interest employer authorisation sought by the TFTU. This allows the three employers to bargain collectively for a proposed multi-enterprise agreement. The Commission found that the requirements in section 249 of the Act were met, and the prohibition in s.249A did not apply. A separate order detailing the specifics of the authorisation was published alongside this decision.
What it means for employers
Employers considering collective bargaining should understand the process for seeking single interest employer authorisations under the Fair Work Act. This allows multiple employers with similar operations to bargain as a group, potentially streamlining negotiations and standardising terms and conditions.
What it means for employees
Union members working for companies involved in similar industries may benefit from collective bargaining through a multi-enterprise agreement. This can lead to improved wages, conditions, and job security compared to individual agreements or awards.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc3027.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →