Application by Tyndale Group Of Christian Schools Ltd. Trading AS Tyndale Group Of Christian Schools & Tyndale Christian School – Salisbury East Inc Trading AS Tyndale Christian School – Salisbury East and Others
Citation: [2026] FWC 2942
What happened
Tyndale Group of Christian Schools Ltd and three associated schools (Tyndale Christian School – Salisbury East, Tyndale Christian School – Strathalbyn, and Tyndale Christian School – Murray Bridge) applied for authorisation to bargain together for a multi-employer enterprise agreement. This would replace existing agreements covering teachers, education support officers, administration staff, wellbeing staff, grounds staff, and central office staff. The Independent Education Union (IEU) supports the application. A previous similar authorisation was granted in 2024.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission has granted the application for a single interest employer authorisation. This allows the four schools to bargain collectively for a new enterprise agreement. The decision is based on evidence and previously issued reasons from a prior, related authorisation. All requirements under the Fair Work Act were met, including common interests, no public interest concerns, and comparability of operations. The authorisation takes effect immediately and expires in one year unless extended.
What it means for employers
Employers seeking to bargain collectively with multiple entities should ensure they can demonstrate a clear common interest and reasonably comparable business activities. Previous decisions regarding authorisations are relevant when applying for subsequent approvals.
What it means for employees
Employees covered by the existing agreements will now be part of collective bargaining negotiations for a new agreement, potentially impacting their pay and conditions. The IEU is representing these employees in the process.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2942.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →