United Firefighters' Union of Australia (259V) v Fire Rescue Victoria
Citation: [2026] FWC 2775
What happened
The United Firefighters' Union of Australia (UFU) initiated a dispute with Fire Rescue Victoria (FRV) regarding a claim for a new allowance related to an 'Income and Associated Financial Loss Management Scheme'. The UFU notified the Fair Work Commission (FWC) on February 16, 2026, following correspondence in January 2026. FRV challenged the FWC’s jurisdiction to hear the dispute. This stemmed from ongoing efforts to reach an agreement on an income protection policy under their Enterprise Agreement. The dispute relates to clauses within Division A and B of the Fire Rescue Victoria Operational Employees Interim Enterprise Agreement 20201, concerning allowances and dispute resolution.
What was decided
The FWC is currently considering jurisdictional matters related to the dispute between the UFU and FRV. the Commissioner has not yet made a final determination on the merits of the allowance claim itself. However, it is assessing whether the Respondent correctly followed the dispute resolution procedures outlined in their Enterprise Agreement before referring the matter to the FWC. the Commission noted that previous Full Bench decisions had highlighted the importance of clear particulars when seeking agreement and considered this relevant to the current jurisdictional challenge.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure any claims for new allowances are clearly defined, providing sufficient detail for meaningful negotiation. Employers must also strictly adhere to dispute resolution procedures outlined in enterprise agreements before involving the FWC. Failing to do so can impact jurisdiction and potentially delay resolutions.
What it means for employees
Employees and unions need to follow established dispute resolution processes within enterprise agreements when pursuing claims. Clear communication of claim details is crucial for facilitating negotiation and ensuring a proper referral to the Fair Work Commission if necessary.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2775.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →