the Applicant v The Trustee For B & J Kennett Family Trust
Citation: [2026] FWC 2767
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant lodged an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on June 30, 2026. He claimed to have been dismissed from The Trustee For B & J Kennett Family Trust on June 25, 2026, after starting employment on January 20, 2026. The Commission initially contacted him regarding the minimum employment period requirement and incomplete fee waiver form, providing deadlines for responses. Despite multiple attempts to contact the Applicant, he did not respond.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Deputy President dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act 2009. The decision was made because the Applicant had not completed the minimum employment period and failed to respond to multiple communications from the Commission regarding this issue. The Commission determined that the application had no reasonable prospects of success, and therefore it could be dismissed without further notice.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they are aware of the minimum employment periods required for unfair dismissal claims (six months for small businesses, one year otherwise). Maintaining clear records of employee start dates is crucial. Consistent communication with applicants regarding application requirements can help identify issues early and potentially avoid unnecessary proceedings.
What it means for employees
Employees lodging unfair dismissal applications must be aware of the minimum employment period requirement. Responding promptly to communications from the Fair Work Commission is essential, as failure to do so may result in your claim being dismissed without further consideration. Ensure all forms are completed correctly and submitted on time.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2767.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →