Skip to main content
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

the Applicant v The Trustee For B & J Kennett Family Trust

Citation: [2026] FWC 2767

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant lodged an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission on June 30, 2026. He claimed to have been dismissed from The Trustee For B & J Kennett Family Trust on June 25, 2026, after starting employment on January 20, 2026. The Commission initially contacted him regarding the minimum employment period requirement and incomplete fee waiver form, providing deadlines for responses. Despite multiple attempts to contact the Applicant, he did not respond.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission Deputy President dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act 2009. The decision was made because the Applicant had not completed the minimum employment period and failed to respond to multiple communications from the Commission regarding this issue. The Commission determined that the application had no reasonable prospects of success, and therefore it could be dismissed without further notice.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they are aware of the minimum employment periods required for unfair dismissal claims (six months for small businesses, one year otherwise). Maintaining clear records of employee start dates is crucial. Consistent communication with applicants regarding application requirements can help identify issues early and potentially avoid unnecessary proceedings.

What it means for employees

Employees lodging unfair dismissal applications must be aware of the minimum employment period requirement. Responding promptly to communications from the Fair Work Commission is essential, as failure to do so may result in your claim being dismissed without further consideration. Ensure all forms are completed correctly and submitted on time.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredundancyunderpaymentmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2767.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases