Application by Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (129V)
Citation: [2026] FWC 2760
What happened
The Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA) applied for a protected action ballot order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This relates to employees of The Victorian Arts Centre Trust. Two other unions, CEPU and CPSU, also made similar applications concerning the same proposed agreement. The employer did not object to the application but reserved rights regarding whether ballot questions would constitute industrial action. A MEAA Organiser declared that genuine bargaining efforts have been undertaken.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission granted leave to amend the application and determined the matter based on submitted documents, without a hearing. The Commissioner found that there was a notification time for the proposed agreement and all requirements of section 443(1) were met. TrueVote Pty Ltd will conduct the ballot, which must close by August 5, 2026. A separate order (PR812381) has been issued, and compulsory conciliation is scheduled with another Commission member.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware of union applications for protected action ballots during enterprise bargaining negotiations. While the employer didn't object in this case, they reserved their right to challenge ballot questions later. This highlights the importance of carefully considering potential industrial action and ensuring compliance with Fair Work Act requirements.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware that union representatives are seeking approval for a protected action ballot regarding their enterprise agreement. The ballot will be conducted by TrueVote Pty Ltd, and a compulsory conciliation conference is scheduled to facilitate negotiations.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc2760.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →