the Applicant v Selcouth Pty Ltd
At a glance
- 1
- MA000011
What happened
the Applicant, a former supervisor at Selcouth Pty Ltd, initiated an unfair dismissal claim under the Fair Work Act. Selcouth objected, arguing the Applicant wasn't protected from unfair dismissal because his employment wasn’t covered by the Mining Industry Award 2020 and his annual earnings exceeded $183,100. the Applicant initially claimed award coverage and lower earnings ($124,278), later withdrawing the award claim but maintaining his income was below the threshold. Selcouth provides industrial cleaning and maintenance services to mining and industrial sectors.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed Selcouth’s jurisdictional objection regarding the Applicant's high income. The Commission found the Applicant’s annual rate of earnings was less than the $183,100 threshold. While he initially argued for award coverage, he later withdrew that claim. The Commission determined his duties did not fall under the Mining Award due to the supervisory nature of his role. The matter will now proceed as an unfair dismissal application.
What it means for employers
Employers should carefully define job roles and responsibilities when assigning titles like 'supervisor' to ensure accurate classification for award coverage and income threshold assessments. Misclassifying employees can lead to costly legal challenges, even if the employee’s actual earnings are below the high-income threshold.
What it means for employees
Employees considering an unfair dismissal claim need to accurately assess their annual rate of earnings, including non-monetary benefits, to determine eligibility. Understanding job classifications and award coverage is crucial for a successful application.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.