Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FCAFederal Court of Australia · 18 September 2022

the Applicant v the Respondent

Citation: [2022] FCA 1106

At a glance

Awards cited
MA000427

What happened

The Applicant and a co-worker led representative proceedings on behalf of groups of workers employed by Romeo Lockleys (Lockleys Foodland). The workers alleged they did not receive their full entitlements under the General Retail Industry Award 2010 for hours worked. The proceedings involved claims for underpayment of wages, and a settlement was negotiated between the parties.

What was decided

The court approved the settlement of the representative proceedings. The Respondent agreed to pay compensation to group members. The court also had to address the costs claimed by the Applicant's lawyers, which initially exceeded proper limits. The court fixed the costs amount at $560,893.52, in accordance with the settlement agreement and applicable legal professional conduct rules.

What it means for employers

Employers who underpay award-covered workers face class action liability. Settlements of such proceedings involve compensation payable to affected group members plus legal costs. Employers should ensure wages comply with applicable modern award rates.

What it means for employees

Workers underpaid under modern awards may pursue representative claims on behalf of groups, with court oversight to ensure settlements are fair and costs are reasonable.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpayment

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2022/2022fca1106

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases