Menon, in the matter of an election for offices of the Manufacturing Division of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (No 2)
Citation: [2021] FCA 859
What happened
An inquiry was ordered into alleged irregularities in election number E2020/114 for the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Manufacturing Division). The alleged irregularities included that 83 members were incorrectly excluded from voting and some candidates were incorrectly prevented from standing. The inquiry related to the election of several divisional offices including Divisional Secretary. the Applicant was a candidate for Divisional Secretary who lost substantially to the Respondent (542 votes to 1890 votes).
What was decided
The court ordered that the inquiry be terminated with respect to the election for Divisional Secretary of the Manufacturing Division. The court found that even if irregularities existed in the voting process, they could not have materially affected the result given the large margin of votes between candidates. The court retained the inquiry regarding the election of other divisional offices.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2021/2021fca0859Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections