Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FCAFederal Court of Australia · 10 February 2021

Fair Work Ombudsman v IE Enterprises Pty Ltd

Citation: [2021] FCA 60

At a glance

Penalty
$256,000
Employees affected
8
Awards cited
MA000191

What happened

IE Enterprises (trading as Uncle Toys) employed eight casual employees at pop-up toy kiosks in Victorian shopping centres from October 2017 to January 2018 during the Christmas season. The company failed to pay minimum rates, superannuation contributions, and failed to keep proper employment records and provide compliant payslips. Employees were underpaid a total of $21,749.19. The sole director, Eyal Israel, was responsible for the company's overall direction and control.

What was decided

The court declared eleven contraventions of the Fair Work Act and General Retail Industry Award 2010, including five serious contraventions. The company was ordered to pay pecuniary penalties of $215,000 and the director was ordered to pay penalties of $41,000. The court emphasised the deliberate and systematic nature of the underpayment conduct which had significant impact on employees.

What it means for employers

Casual workers employed for seasonal work remain entitled to full award rates and superannuation contributions. Directors and senior management are personally liable for company contraventions. Deliberately underpaying casual workers and failing to keep records will result in substantial penalties, even for smaller employers. Penalties for serious contraventions will be higher.

What it means for employees

Casual workers have the same award rate entitlements as permanent workers. Seasonal employment does not reduce your rights to minimum wages or superannuation. If you are a casual employee, the Respondent must still pay superannuation and keep proper records. Seasonal workers in retail must be paid applicable penalty rates for weekend and public holiday work.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentwage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2021/2021fca0060

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases