Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union
Citation: [2014] FCA 1373
What happened
The Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate brought an application against the Construction, Forestry, Mining & Energy Union (CFMEU) and several individuals. The case concerned events at a construction site in Docklands, Victoria, on February 17-19, 2011. Grocon was building a project for Mirvac, involving the erection of a tower crane. CFMEU members blocked access to the site, preventing the delivery of cranes and equipment. The dispute involved issues regarding a four-person crane crew and union representation of workers.
What was decided
The Federal Court dismissed the application brought by the Director of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate. The court ordered that the Applicant pay the Respondents' costs. The Director was given permission to seek an order setting aside or varying a previous order. The court found no unlawful industrial action occurred based on the evidence presented.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure clear communication and adherence to agreed-upon work practices, particularly regarding union representation and site access. Disputes over manning levels or worker representation can escalate quickly if not addressed through proper channels. Maintaining open dialogue with unions is crucial for resolving disagreements before they disrupt operations.
What it means for employees
Employees involved in industrial action must understand the legal ramifications of their actions. Union members should be aware of potential consequences if actions are deemed unlawful by the Fair Work Commission or Federal Court. It’s important to follow established dispute resolution processes.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2014/2014fca1373Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections