Skip to main content
FCAFederal Court of Australia · 16 April 2013

EnergyAustralia Yallourn Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union

Citation: [2013] FCA 360

What happened

EnergyAustralia and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union were engaged in enterprise bargaining for a new agreement to replace an existing workplace agreement at Yallourn Power Station. A protected action ballot was conducted in February 2013, with over 83% turnout and 92-96% approval for various forms of industrial action. The union gave notice of intention to take multiple forms of industrial action. The 30-day period for commencing such action expired on 15 March 2013. On 18 March 2013, the union applied to extend this period by up to 30 days.

What was decided

EnergyAustralia sought a stay of the Fair Work Commission's decision to extend the period and an injunction to prevent the threatened industrial action. The court refused both the stay and the injunction. The court found that the Commission had jurisdiction to extend the period after it had expired, and that on the balance of convenience, the interlocutory relief should not be granted.

What it means for employers

Employers cannot easily obtain injunctive relief to prevent authorized industrial action even where significant commercial losses are anticipated. Courts focus on whether there is a serious question to be tried and the balance of convenience.

What it means for employees

Industrial action authorized by ballot can proceed within the protected period, and delays in commencing action do not necessarily defeat the authorization.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2013/2013fca0360

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases